Hi everyone,
I’m curious to get your take on something that cropped up recently. I’ve been in this game for 25 years, and I’m starting to see a trend that feels like a bit of a step backward for our profession.
A client of mine recently had an HSE visit. The inspector spotted a piece of equipment being used that carried a “Not for Commercial Use” label. Because of that sticker alone, the HSE told the business they couldn’t use it. End of story.
Now, I see both sides. I get that manufacturers often use these labels to protect themselves from warranty claims or because they haven’t tested the kit for 24/7 industrial intensity. But here’s my beef:
The manufacturer has no idea how my client is actually using that kit. If the “intensity of use” is low, the environment is controlled, and the item has been inspected and found fit for the specific task, why is a marketing label overriding a professional Risk Assessment?
Neither the HSWA nor any of the “6 Pack” regulations specify the grade of the kit—they demand that equipment is suitable and fit for purpose.
• Are we losing the art of the technical argument?
• Is the HSE being overly harsh, or are we as a profession becoming too reliant on “tick-box” compliance?
• If I’ve assessed it as safe, why is a manufacturer’s disclaimer making the safety call?
I’d love to hear how some of you would handle this. Would you push back on the inspector, or is that label the “be-all and end-all” for you?
Discuss! 